Wright Chat

 
FAQ FAQ Register Register
Search Search Profile Profile
Memberlist Memberlist Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
Usergroups Usergroups Log in Log in

>> Return to SaveWright Home Page

Kalil House, Manchester NH for sale
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
victoriad



Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:15 am    Post subject: Kalil House, Manchester NH for sale Reply with quote

Announced today on NHPR:

https://www.nhpr.org/post/rare-frank-lloyd-wright-usonian-automatic-home-new-hampshire-be-sold#stream/0

Realtor listing:

http://franklloydwrighthouseforsalenewhampshire.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DavidC



Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 7184
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are asking $850K. For what it's worth, Redfin, Realtor and Zillow give estimates in the ~$300K - $360K range. Looks like the home might sit unsold for quite some time.

Do you know if the Currier Museum has expressed any interest in the possibility of owning two Wright homes?


David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
victoriad



Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Posts: 43

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 8:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is doubtful the Currier would be interested in ownership of Kalil (as we have been told). One Frank Lloyd Wright house is enough Very Happy

There appears to be new development (homes) adjacent to the Kalil site. It's a very desirable neighborhood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18285
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A favorite Yukio Futagawa photo:














Text and right-hand plan © 1993 by William Allin Storrer

Other material, © 1988 A.D.A EDITA Tokyo Co., Ltd. and by the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 9602

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fascinating house, but it would make me nervous.
Not that I would expect the concrete ceiling to fall on my head, but there are only 2 egresses from the house, and none in the bedroom wing.
Fire and all that.
I also suspect my claustrophobia might not like it much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jay



Joined: 02 May 2016
Posts: 221

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
They are asking $850K. For what it's worth, Redfin, Realtor and Zillow give estimates in the ~$300K - $360K range. Looks like the home might sit unsold for quite some time.


A short while back, I became curious about Usonian home values in comparison to the median home value index's of its area.
(Fourth comment down on this thread I explain my very basic approach to the math: http://wrightchat.savewright.org/viewtopic.php?t=11488&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=a47ed3724c38b30d84d6093bedc9e6e6)

I came up with a figure that suggested an average "Wright" premium would have the price ratio of 2.25 to 1 for median value. I recognize this number is hardly scientific, so take it with a grain of salt. But it did demonstrate that Olflet was badly overpriced for its area....

The median value of 03104 (northern Manchester) is $264,800. That puts the current asking price for the Kalil house to be a 3.2 to 1 ratio to the index. (Not terrible, as Olflelt began with an asking price of a 5.2 to 1 ratio, and finally sold for 4.3 to 1....) Yet if 2.25:1 is the more appropriate Usonians-to-Median-Value figure, we'd probably want to see Kalil selling for $600,000.

That said, $600k seems like a steal for this home, given its location... And a 3:1 ratio doesn't seem egregious, like Olfelt did... Hopefully the Usonian Automatic is as desired as Wright's other Usonians, which I used to arrive at my "ratio". That could be a wrinkle, as Roderick alludes to.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18285
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As the perceived "necessary" size of the home has grown over the last half-century (or less ?), the typical Usonian shrinks in size by comparison. Kallis is
a two-bedroom house (originally designed, apparently, with three); another conceivable price metric might be $ per bedroom---or at least include the number
of bedrooms somewhere in the formula ?

S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jay



Joined: 02 May 2016
Posts: 221

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right, a real formula could be attempted, looking at bedrooms, square footage, lot size, condition, commutability, etc.

One observation though...while the Usonians were designed as family homes, and were originally used in that capacity (mostly), it'd be telling to learn how many Usonians are currently occupied by families with school-age children. Seems to me that most Usonians are now owned by "empty nesters", sometimes as second-homes to people who live in urban areas.

I could imagine the Kalil house being an ideal part-time home for a successful couple in NYC, for example. In which case, I doubt having 2 bedrooms instead of 3 would be an issue.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DRN



Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 3838
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The house looks to be well cared for, but any UA should be very carefully examined by a roofing expert and a structural engineer prior to agreeing to a purchase price. The roof block slabs are built level and if a roof is allowed to stay well beyond its service life, water can get between the roofing and the block slab and stay there...if water finds any cracks in the roof block joints and makes it to the rebar in the channels between the blocks, repairs can be difficult and expensive to perform.

These are great and stalwart houses, but they are vulnerable to neglect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18285
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2019 11:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I misspoke: the original design showed two bedrooms and a single bath, while the built plan finds a way to have two baths as well as two bedrooms.

S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
loo tee



Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This house seems grossly overpriced, regardless of the neighborhood. Also painfully claustrophobic, as Rod Grant observes.

Wright was clearly off-course with his Usonian Automatic theme. I wouldn't live in this house even if it were given to me free. It just goes to show that old men usually don't do very good work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18285
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Heh-heh. Wait until you're old, then see if you agree with that statement ...!

Emergency egress is an issue, I suppose; today's buildings codes (even liberals like me catch themselves muttering about the Nanny State) would
prevent this error, if it is one. But this is a largely fireproof house---something one doesn't find Wright mentioning in connection with the Textile Block
and UA, oddly, unlike with the Fireproof House design of 1905. Perhaps he wearied of thinking about fires.

S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jay



Joined: 02 May 2016
Posts: 221

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
overpriced, regardless of the neighborhood


At this moment, in multiple places in our country, there are realtor conferences in session, with hundreds of realtors bowing their heads in unison, softly whispering the "3 rules of real estate" mantra.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Roderick Grant



Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 9602

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SDR, while the concrete may be fire-resistant, every building is full of fuel, upholstery, drapes, wood, paper etc., and once the concrete cage is emptied of its fuel, it's no good to anyone.
I'm with Loo Tee on this one, I wouldn't want to live in it at any price, no matter the location, location, location.
(By the way, while Loo Tee is young at heart, he is superannuated.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDR



Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 18285
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2019 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But do you agree that "old men usually don't do very good work" ?

I find that a lifetime's experience---including observation of the follies of youth, the waning of "look at me," and the maturity of one's design sensibilities---combine
to produce the best and most reasonable work ever. The only hiccups might be momentary lapses of memory, and overconfidence in one's abilities ?

Of course any building contains flammables. I can't agree that an all-masonry structure need be written off after a less-than-calamitous conflagration---necessarily.

S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Wright Chat Forum Index -> Click Here for General Discussion Posts All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP