EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Wright's principles have made an impact on budding Gen Y architects who have helped develop a Gulf-coast community for displaced residents of Hurricane Katrina. This is Mr. Wright's legacy at work, continually inspiring the youth of this country. Read the article here: http://prairiemod.typepad.com/prairiemo ... y_the.html
Any thoughts or reflections?
I agree partially with your statesments, Mr. Grant--economic forces do drive all things in this world. But I'm not so cynical as to think that there is not a middle ground that can be reached in urban development that is both architecturally and economically sound.
It's too early to tell on the Lily Valley experiment, but so far I feel they are at least starting off on the right foot. To consider both the ecological impact of a development as well as the social and financial aspect of the buildings, all under the guiding light of Frank Lloyd Wright's principles of Architecture to me is something that has never been fully tried. There's been little experiments here and there (The tiny Usonian communes in New York and Michigan, etc) but nothing of this magnitude. In spirit (and hopefully execution) I think it's much different than the examples you mentioned.
Soleri's Arcosanti? It's a pie-in-the-sky pipe dream out in the middle of nowhere that doesn't consider either economics or architectural aestheic principles in any real sense (the buildings are souless and unattractive and the whole thing is being financed by bells and pottery.)
I wouldn't consider Detroit successful as a city on any level since it is neither attractive, nor economically doing so well. It's the opposite end of the spectrum from Howard's Garden City concept; both being extremes in a sense. An extreme idea of any kind rarely has any real longevity in this world. It's moderation and principle that transcend.
I didn't get the sense that Lily Valley is trying to be some "White City" on a hill. It seemed to me to be an attempt to apply principles to living and urban planning in a way that sets an example for what American city life could (and probably should) be like. Will it be successful? That remains to be seen, but I for one applaud the spirit to try anything in a positive and principled manner.
Hell, it's better than dumping a ton of FEMA trailers in the bayou!
The plan appears have the curved streets typical of a builder's development, but there is a network of them which could in time ease conjestion at the main entrance onto Rt 49. What this network if streets will connect to remains to be seen, as there is little in the area except commercial properties along Rt. 49 at this point. To be fair, Seaside and other Traditional Neighborhood Developments such as the Kentlands in Maryland, have been successful and have attracted other communites to build around them.
The key to the lower priced units will be the availability of low cost transportation from Lilly Valley to the jobs for the intended lower income buyers. I'm not sure if Hattiesburg has bus service to the area. The auction workers may be a source of low income buyers if they are paid a living wage.
The Commercial aspect seems a bit shaky from a marketing point of view as some of the building forms do not present to Rt 49 and would be entirely dependent upon traffic from within the development, which at 220 units, is too small to support much more than a convienience store.
But these are just planning particulars, James Polk is more than capable. Over all, I like that they are trying something other than the status quo in not just regional planning, but also with respect to energy consumption, and building technology. Though there is a lot of wood around that area it is not the best building material when one considers the moisture, the termites, and the potential for hurricanes. I say best of luck.