EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Repointed, maybe ...SDR wrote:"master mason Dave Bergmann, who replaced 40 percent of the homeâ€™s brick"
Good lord. I had no idea. Why would that have been necessary ? Is that a journalist's error ?
Humble student of the Master
"Youth is a circumstance you can't do anything about. The trick is to grow up without getting old." - Frank Lloyd Wright
We come across more and more instances of the moisture-infiltration problem. I wish we had the input of lapsed poster Laurie Virr, a dedicated Usonian architect from Down Under who has passed on to us brick-work insights in the past. One wants to ask: is a brick wall inherently vulnerable without flashing of some sort at, or near, its top surface ?
A Usonian was restored/rebuilt not long ago, with an almost ridiculously prominent through-wall flashing inserted beneath the cap course. Was this moisture issue always a problem with brick walls ? Seems counter-intuitive, somehow . . .
At Kraus, can we assume that bricks from the house were saved and re-used ? It can be very difficult to precisely duplicate 65-year-old brick with new material.
Top of wall coping is important for keeping water out of the cavity behind brick veneer because if it gets in there it's well on its way to getting inside the rest of the wall construction where it can cause all sorts of trouble. Coping doesn't have to be metal. It could be masonry (like cut or cast stone) but mortar joints are vulnerable and are better if flexible sealants are used. The idea with masonry veneer walls systems is to redirect moisture back out of the cavity via weep holes at the bottom of the wall. It is a risky move to use only a brick rowlock at the top of a wall because bricks absorb moister and all those mortar joints are even more porous.
I think the freeze/thaw problem is more of a worry the farther north you go. The farther south you go it becomes more of a danger for growing mold, rotting any adjacent wood, corroding metals and yucky stuff like that.
I hate that ungainly solution I've seen in places where the band-aid of metal cap flashing being sandwiched underneath masonry coping (which at that point is just window dressing). It's a path-of-least-resistance functional solution without thought of appearance. There are other ways to get it done with more finesse. If that bulky metal underbelly flashing solution is the best you can do, then you need to go back to the drawing board.
No pun intended, but slipping thru the cracks was a waterproofing consultant's detail where he specified metal flashing underneath new cut stone coping where we were already sealing the joints with sealant rather than mortar. In my opinion, this was belt & suspenders. The egregious part of the detail was that the exposed vertical face of the shiny silver metal extended several inches down the wall underneath the stone coping. Looking at it made my teeth hurt. It made the cut stone coping on top look dishonest.
I don't object to a flashing installation underneath masonry coping if it is subtle, but I think it's a visual flaw if the metal has a big vertical face exposed rather than a careful & discreet little peek-a-boo.
his office a while back . . .
The example I hate, done by my office (on a renovation project of a historically significant neo-classical building) called attention to itself for the cheapness of the material, the sloppiness of the work, and the ilogic of exposing 3" of metal flashing under perfectly good, brand new stone coping.
The quality of your house is one part artistic design (by the Master), but also the fact that it appears to be in immaculate condition. With a 50+ yr old cutting edge design that requires quite a commitment to restoration skill.
Peter, it serves as an indicator of how competent your installation is.
I think the cornucopia left to us by FLW (and his apprentices) of artisitic creations meeting real-world conditions generates a never ending challenge to maintain the aesthetic vision while fixing the boo boos.
Repeating one of my favorite FLW client quotes: "It's what happens when you leave a work of art out in the rain."