Parkwyn Village ~ McCartney Residence for Sale

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
jhealy
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 8:11 pm
Location: Oak Park, IL

Post by jhealy »

I just looked at what Zillow shows the value of this house to be. I know, Zillow is not ultimate authority, but it gives you some idea. Zillow shows the value of this house to be $148,000. Obviously, it does not take into account that it is by Wright. There is a non-Wright house for sale on Taliesin Dr., just down the road, for $142,500 - that house is 4 bedrooms, 2 baths and 2,300 square feet. If that house sells, given its larger size, it would presumably even lower the Zillow estimate for McCartney.

If you go by pharding's 20% rule, McCartney might sell at around $177,000, which would result in a big loss to the seller given his/her purchase price (as shown on Zillow). That seems low for a Wright house, but keep in mind that Lamberson and Haynes have gone for prices like that in better real estate markets.

Jay

Education Professor
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:10 pm

Post by Education Professor »

I do hope that McCartney finds a responsible steward very soon. It is an interesting design based upon the Maginel Wright Barney cottage project. A final unrealized version of the cottage was the Lovness Cottage C design.

Personally, I think the Howard Anthony home in Benton Harbor, MI, is a richer realization/ interpretation of the Wright Barney cottage than McCartney, especially in terms of the craftsmanship and the quality of the materials that were used. Unfortunately, I don't have any photos of Anthony to post.

Wright Barney Cottage project:
Image

Lovness Cottage C project:
Image

EP

Deke
Posts: 692
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:18 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Deke »

I'll make the same proposal here that I made when Lamberson was for sale...let's get a group together and buy it as a time-share.

Deke

SDR
Posts: 20086
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

Image

Image
© W A Storrer

Image

peterm
Posts: 6287
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 10:27 am
Location: Chicago, Il.---Oskaloosa, Ia.

Post by peterm »

SDR- Do you know what year the photos are from?

SDR
Posts: 20086
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

No, I'm afraid not. The exterior is in C Besinger's book; the second was provided by a WC reader whose identity I can't now recall. Anyone ? It's reminiscent of the naturally-lighted photos of Y Futagawa, isn't it.

SDR

BBuck
Posts: 226
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:48 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Post by BBuck »

As much as I love this house and the potential it presents, there's still the economy of it all that plays it's role. Perhaps this is why it remains on the market? Poor marketing, mysterious and lack of information.

Moving it, albeit an attractive option, would be silly and costly. It is planted firmly in that ground and wrong to move it.

I looked into a teaching opportunity in Kalamazoo currently available. One year, low salary- no benefits and only a one year contract subject to a renewal. Can't bank on that and a move from warm to cold would be difficult. Then there's the disconnect from my family, my few clients and anything I've been able to build on a local level.

As I've said before, it's a dynamic space. Someone with more resources should snap it up.

Education Professor
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:10 pm

Post by Education Professor »

SDR...thanks for posting the images of Anthony....I especially like the exterior photo from Besinger's book.

BBuck, I agree with your sentiments.....hopefully the right fit of resources and respect for Wright's work will emerge soon.

EP

Roderick Grant
Posts: 10537
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

As handsome as McCartney and Anthony are, as with most of FLW's designs, the first iteration for Maginel is still the best. It's an idea that is complete in every way, while the later renditions are almost overwrought. Maginel = lyrical; McCartney = classical; Anthony = baroque. Too bad Maginel didn't follow through and build her brother's masterpiece. Even the heavier Lovness version would be great.

I believe the cottage is one of the Top Ten Unbuilt Projects, 1930-1959 on Geiger's list.

Education Professor
Posts: 594
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 3:10 pm

Post by Education Professor »

Well said, Roderick.........

EP

FTA
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:56 pm

Post by FTA »

Re relocation of McCartney house ...

The relocation of Pope (twice!) was mentioned. The Stockman house (Mason City) was relocated to save it ... my recollection is that it did not share its original orientation at the new location.

Of course, the Exhibition House was disassembled and we all know what became of that "disaster."

The Little house (Wayzata, MN) was demolished and the Living Room reassembled in the Metropolitan Museum of Art (NYC). A similar scenario with the lobby of the Imperial Hotel - also moved quite a l-o-n-g distance from its original location.

Of course, Frank Lloyd Wright's remains were exhumed, cremated, and relocated ... but that can be another discussion. ;-)

What other of Wright's buildings - in whole or in part - have been disassembled and relocated? DOES THIS NEED TO BE ANOTHER THREAD?

Mike ... to save costs, maybe you could simply disassemble, relocate, and preserve the original McCartney house only and sell the rest block by block and piece by piece on ebay to help cover the expense of relocation?
Former Taliesin Apprentice

Wrightgeek
Posts: 1548
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Westerville, Ohio

Post by Wrightgeek »

FTA-

Since you asked the question, the Gordon Residence in Oregon was moved from it's original location to a botanical garden in order to prevent it's demolition.

And both the Duncan Residence, in Lisle, IL, and the Jackson Residence, in Madison, WI, two Erdman prefabs, were moved from their original locations and reconstructed as well.

Healeyjet
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 7:20 pm

Post by Healeyjet »

Does anyone have a ballpark figure of what it would cost to attempt such an undertaking as dismantling and rebuilding a house?
Ward

dkottum
Posts: 427
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:52 pm
Location: Battle Lake, MN

Post by dkottum »

Why not build a replica and save dismantling, moving, and restoration costs? There is little of the Usonian materials, primarily masonry, wood, glass, that is unique.

Doug K

PrairieMod
Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:40 pm
Location: www.prairiemod.com

Post by PrairieMod »

I have to agree that moving the house should be an absolute last resort. A big part of McCartney's importance and uniqueness is as part of the Parkwyn Village collection of Wright houses that it it connected to. Separating it from this Wright-conceived community would lessen both the house and whole Village.

I want to believe that there will eventually be the right owner to come along and both appreciate and preserve the home where it's at. It's not a lost cause....yet.

Post Reply