Residential architects building smaller affordable houses

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
PNB
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:12 am

Residential architects building smaller affordable houses

Post by PNB »

One of the things I admire about FLLW was his interest in building affordable beautiful homes for the middle class. Are there any great architects doing this today?

jlesshafft
Posts: 62
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 2:56 pm

Post by jlesshafft »

Except...wasn't FLW a disaster at that? Every home he designed went way over budget, and ended up beyond the means of normal middle class individuals.

His homes were and still are works of art, but affordable they weren't.

Johnzerd1
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:12 am

Post by Johnzerd1 »

actually a few of them came in under budget....

PNB
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:12 am

Post by PNB »

I'm aware that sometimes this was a disaster that nearly ruined the client but there are those like Pope Leighey, Goetsch Winkler, and Jacobs 1 where I believe he didn't strain the clients resources as much. Anyways that is beyond the point of my question so I will state it again. Are there any great architects out there building beautiful homes for the middle class?

Ed Jarolin
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Wyoming

Post by Ed Jarolin »

Actually he was pretty successful at staying on budget with the pre-WWII Usonians. Jacobs I and Goetsch-Winckler came in right on the estimates. Pope and Lloyd Lewis were very close, although every item had to be closely monitored, bid out separately, etc. by the apprentice on site. Granted, Hanna with its intricate module is a pre-war that went well over.

I think the massive post-war inflation contributed a great deal to his missing the target with many of the later houses. The growing affluence of his clientele also contributed to his cavalier attitude on budgets.

As a point of interest, here are the wage figures from a 1940 letter between Wright and Loren Pope.

Common laborer: 40 to 50 cents/hour
Bricklayer: 9 to 12 dollars/day
Carpenters: 75 cents to 1.10/hour (higher figure for finish carpenter)
Plumbers: 90 cents to 1.10/hour

karnut
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 12:45 pm

Post by karnut »

Bart Prince could do it. Within budget!!!
Last edited by karnut on Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SDR
Posts: 19778
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

I'm not sure how the original question will be answered, except anecdotally. I assume the quest is to know if architect-designed moderate-cost homes are being built, and I don't know where that information might be accumulated. The time and effort to design an original, site- and client-specific structure, with the kind of thoughtful detail that we've come to expect (and that so often looks "simple" in the photos) just doesn't come cheap -- except when the architect is working for himself.

Come to think of it, a good answer might be to look at young architects' own homes. Books of these are published almost yearly, it seems. Although some of the solutions are a bit quirky or iconoclastic -- architects seem willing to put up with some irregularities to the usual domestic pattern -- there is still much to be learned. There are often good examples of budget stretching in these houses.

The extreme economies of projects like the original Levittowns in New York (Long Island) and Pennsylvania depended on a very small number of variations, replicated in the hundreds in one massive building program. Perhaps a combination of this approach, with designs of the sort we prefer, would be possible today ?

SDR

JimM
Posts: 1556
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Austin,Texas

Post by JimM »

karnut wrote:Bart Prince could do it. Within budget!!!
As wonderful as his work is, there is nothing typical, as far as I know, about the "budgets" Prince usually has to contend with.

SDR
Posts: 19778
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Post by SDR »

That was my impression. Are we wrong, karnut ?

I suppose every architect has at least thought about the problem of affordability. After all, the goal is to get stuff built. . .?

SDR

Johnzerd1
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:12 am

Post by Johnzerd1 »

Define middle class ....... how much does a middle class home cost, the last figure I saw for average household income was around $65,000 ...... how much of a house can you afford? give me a $ figure and what area are you wanting to build in?

Johnzer

Deke
Posts: 692
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:18 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Deke »

The two biggest costs in a single family home at land and labor. Land we can't do much about (though we should), but labor can be economized by the use of pre-fab modules. Course most pre-fab work these days involve steel cages and the results costs millions.

Deke

PNB
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 10:12 am

Post by PNB »

Defining middle class...... that's a term that even the so called experts don't agree on. As for me I did not post this question because I want to build - I am satisfied for now remodeling my somewhat commonplace but extremely livable 50's ranch. My interest in architecture is residential and I prefer smaller well laid out homes.

Johnzerd1
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 11:12 am

Post by Johnzerd1 »

I am sure that some would love the challenge, figure on the fee being around 8% of the construction cost....

RJH
Posts: 682
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Contact:

Post by RJH »

Here is one of my favorite houses. It was designed in 1949 by a Yale Architect grad Joseph Salerno. He was a FLW fan and had even written FLW and set up a Wright visit and speach to Yale. It was his personal house. Floorplan shape is a shoebox. It is 2BR, 1BA and only around 900 sft. It has a courtyard with a floor to celing glass wall. Roof is sloped facing south. Exterior siding is also used on the interior too. Note the landscaping is all native (but some others not due to new owner) and makes such an impact in "hiding" the house instead of "showing it off" like most houses do. Black band around base (Richard Neutra) makes house float off the ground. 2' wide doors and windows same as FLW. House designed on grid system. But, here architect uses flagstone for outdoor areas which looks beutiful and natural. Very cheap to construct today. All studs. This is the work of a young fresh architect.

Thoughts...comments...???

Image

Image

Image

karnut
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 12:45 pm

bart prince

Post by karnut »

Bart has done a few hud projects, and they are very cool.Prince can do it because he was also trained as a builder. Knows what works, and what won"t.Bart is not only for the rich!!!!!.

Post Reply