EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
http://media.npr.org/programs/atc/featu ... index.html
NPR apparently plans a program on the restoration of the campus.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... d=14933254
I also donâ€™t believe that visitors appreciate the small colored glass in the concrete brick walls. When inside the building, the lights become very amazing.
I have been on quite a few college campuses in my time. I would say this one is the most peaceful.
My wife and I had the pleasure of a tour in late 1998 given by a family friend who attended the College in 1950-54. He recalled urine donation to treat the copper and he recalled shoveling a lot of sand from the site into mixers. He also recalled a site visit by Wright whom he described as "very well dressed" and always surrounded by "administrators and people with note pads". Our friend studied citrus agriculture at the College and had a career in citus farming until his retirement. When we were there, there were few orange trees remaining on the grounds. Our friend noted the trees required alot of maintenance: pruning, harvesting, treatments, irrigation in drought etc. He noted the trees were removed as they died and were not replaced. I wonder if new trees could be planted and leased to a grower or maintained as an agriculture lab for new varieties or other tests. They have the benefit of being relatively isolated from commercial groves.
It was interesting when I asked how tall the trees typically were, our friend pointed at a Wright building and noted "they were about the height of the top of the blocks over there". He remembered the campus seeming bigger when the trees were there and some of the buildings only being visible right when you reached them or from down certain rows of trees. I guess the trees were important to the design...they provided a grid in plan and a veil in perspective.
SDR- The house Wright designed for President Ludd Spivey was not constructed. Money was always tight and efforts were focused on campus buildings that would provide student/faculty educational/support space.
"We do not yet have a full plan for campus landscaping. Some of our considerations as we continue our landscape design discussions are related to the green campus initiative and a goal to use fewer pesticides and chemicals. I will keep you posted."
But the weird part may be there are no windows, as we know windows, at the circular living room ground floor. Instead the concrete block is all perforated, to let in light, and provide maybe a controlled view outside. Needing more view, you may go up to the living room balcony. This looks like a very nice space for this particular site.
Back to weird, and we expect Wright to think differently. Is the upper living room open to weather all around? Comments?
Doug Kottom, Battle Lake
The perspective view of the house is an example of Wright's tendency to allow imperfect rendition of arcs in drawings of circular projects; while he insists on plausible and convincing shadow effects, he seems blind to badly-drawn ellipses. Drawings of the spiral Automobile Objective, the Windfohr house (Fort Worth, 1949) and Sea Cliff (Scheme Two) (San Francisco, 1954) are other examples of unfortunate renderings of circular schemes in perspective. (John Howe's drawings, if I can distinguish them correctly, seem to be spared this indignity.)
(Moreover, this perspective suffers from an anomaly: if the horizon line runs through the middle of the lower drum, the shoreline as drawn to the right is an impossibility.)
There is a second version of this scheme, for another Florida client, a Dr Alfred Bergman, in 1947.
When I visited FSC it was extremely HOT and the sun was blasting away. It must have been close to 100F. I donâ€™t recall what season of the year was. When I went in many of the building it was quite comfortable, sheltered from the sun and cool inside even though the A/C was not on. I specifically remember this in the larger chapel (I think Danforth). What was very nice was towards the very rear of the chapel behind all the pews was a darkish area with a solid almost 2 story wall of perforated colored ( red, yellow and blue) glass. It was VERY nice space and extremely beautiful. I just stood there stunned because the small colored glass was perfect. If this is what the lower level of Spivey would look like I would call it a success. Even if Rod hadnâ€™t mentioned his worry about dark and dank space I would still have posted this experience right up there with my esplanade experience because it made that much of an impact on me. One question I always keep asking is, â€œHow did Wright know?â€�
Furthermore, the glass is very small. It exactly measurers 2.25â€� x 3â€� and some of the tiny smaller glass squares are only 0.50â€�.
Iâ€™ve learned to always give Wright the benefit of the doubt. Iâ€™ve visited too many Wright designs where I thought before visiting in person they were not that great - but only to be totally wrong afterwards. Haynes being a prime example.
Rod, by the way I sent John Geiger small Haynes drawings for his analysis. He already told me this a while back ago:
I hope to post his analysis soon.Haynes would rank somewhere with the better work for that time frame. It is a very good house.