Response to M Shuck's Post on Hildeband's Palmer Book

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.


This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Post Reply
Posts: 2253
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 5:19 pm
Location: River Forest, Illinois

Response to M Shuck's Post on Hildeband's Palmer Book

Post by pharding »

Because of major problems with this horrible Wright Chat software, which I have repeatedly asked to be fixed, I cannot post responses to a thread. I am forced to create a new thread. So much for modern technology.

Where did FLW design ideas come from? Based upon my extensive research and my own architectural design intuition I offer my own theories about whom I believe to be the greatest architect in world history.

Personality Because of both nature (genetics) and nurture by both parents, FLW was blessed with great skills. Was he brilliant? He may have developed brilliant ideas over time, but in my opinion he was not brilliant. He was probably above average in intelligence. His greatest strength was his synthesis of personal skills and a supremely self-confident desire to develop an innovative architectural language. He was not a sensitive individual and was not deterred by failure or setbacks or the norms of society. Taking enormous personal and professional risks was not a deterrent. He seemed to thrive on risk taking when it yielded the potential of innovation. He was a bit impulsive at times. At the same time when he developed or found a great idea elsewhere that contributed to his developing architectural language, he had the wisdom to take hold of it and use it repeatedly. He had an incredibly dogged perseverance in pursuing his vision of an original architectural language. With time he developed great intuition. This incredible stew of personal traits was the core of an extremely creative individual with great sales skills who was driven for recognition and success.

Eclecticism Someone described FLW as being an architectural magpie. I believe that he was both an architectural magpie and a visionary. He was certainly opportunistic. His initial design language and life long design philosophy in my opinion borrows heavily from Louis Sullivan. Although FLW decried Beaux Arts Architecture, he certainly used their proportional systems throughout his career. This reinforced what he learned as a young child educated with the German Froebel System.

The Japanese Pavilion at the Columbian Exhibition was critical to FLW and others development of what became known decades later as The Prairie School. This term was coined not by FLW, but his good friend Robert Spencer. The Japanese Pavilion was the source of two fundamental ingredients of FLW's Prairie House language, the running head trim that tied together doors, wall openings, and windows in a wonderful horizontal, lyrical manner. Also FLW took the broad overahanging eaves from this critical source. Prior to the world's fair FLW had an affinity for Japonisme with its incredible impact on western culture.

The Prairie School architectural language was not developed by FLW in a vacuum without unrecognized from other fine young architects and employees. Robert Spencer developed a wonderful residential design, based upon the Japanese Pavilion, that FLW had tacked up on the wall above his desk according to Marion Mahoney. This was part of the inspiration for early FLW Prairie House language. Other young talented architects that FLW shared a studio with contributed to the language. A truly great conceptual idea that FLW used with wonderful effect on several masterworks came from an employee, Walter Burley Griffin, in response to a challenging design problem. The Thomas House site was right up against a multi-story Victorian apartment building. It was Walter Burley Griffin
Last edited by pharding on Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Posts: 494
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by PrairieMod »

Thanks, Mr. Harding, for your in-depth thoughts on Frank Lloyd Wright's design idea origins. Very well thought out and interesting. Keep up the good work (despite the technical headaches!)

Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 5:44 pm
Location: Austin,Texas

Post by JimM »

Good insights, Paul. I think the only thing I disagree with is the lack of "brilliance". I think much proved him human, and he surely knew when to "take" something as his own; but I do not know how such references could evolve into the great work he created, without a natural propensity for brilliance-even genius.

I think if you agree that his work was superior to his contemporaries, and with his lifelong record of accomplishment well documented, "something" sets artists as Wright apart from others. His buildings speak like no others.

Post Reply