EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Laurie has communicated to me that Roger Grant thought highly of this little house. I think it is worthy of discussion.
Now...What might be best way to link an image, without troubling SDR?
Whaddya got ?
https://msd.unimelb.edu.au/alumni/alumn ... aurie-virr
Unfortunately it is gone forever, due to a fire. I've sent SDR an image to post.
He wrote to me twice about the house, in 2009 and 2010. Here is the pertinent content of the first e-mail:
"I too am drawn to the small houses: they have an endless fascination for me. Attached is the ground plan of a house I designed in 1973, and apart from Rivendell, it is my favorite work. It has a concrete floor slab, scored on the module [1200 mm], the walls are concrete masonry units, the sash and French doors the most exquisite Western Red Cedar. The ceiling is plywood, laid checkerboard, and cut so that the joints lined with the scored grooves below, and the roof, cedar shingles. It is just 78.4 square meters in area [842 square feet]. [In assessing area, buildings in Aus. are measured outside the walls]. The uninterrupted distance across the living room to the kitchen is 13.134 meters [42.95 feet]. Above the door head height of the closets on either side of the bedroom, glass extends to the ceiling, so that the space revolves completely around the masonry of the chimney mass.
"The bench seat in the living room was designed as the width of a single bed, with the back squabs made especially thick so that it provided utility for both these uses. It is of a length to furnish 3 extra sleeping places should they be desired.
"The house was originally sited to face true north, but immediately before construction the client opted for the ocean view rather than the solar orientation.
"Unfortunately the house was sold, and had the ugliest addition made to it. It was a little gem, but the new owners did not appreciate what they had purchased.
"In my immodest way, I think it is a much better design than the Seth Petersen cottage."
And here are the relevant passages from the subsequent writing:
"For many years I held that to have one’s work photographed and published was infra dignitatem. As a consequence some of the buildings with which I was involved have never been recorded other than with drawings. Many are so remote from Canberra that it is scarcely worth my while to engage a photographer to visit them. Others, unfortunately, have been subject to most unsympathetic alterations and additions, including the beach house for Mrs Percival, which I consider to be amongst the best Architecture I have been responsible for.
"To my mind this last was a good idea, and when it was first completed it was a gem of a house, even tho I make the claim myself. Concrete masonry unit walls, Western Red Cedar sash and French doors, a raking ceiling of plywood, laid checkerboard, and cut so that the joints matched the module scribed in the floor, cedar shingles on the roof. There was a vista of almost 13 meters from the bench seat to the kitchen: that in a house of 76.4 square meters outside the walls. The alterations and additions were so awful that I was in tears when I viewed them. The new owners really did not appreciate what they had purchased."
There are other interesting portions of that e-mail, but I'll defer to the present subject, for now.
Here is Laurie's presentation page on the Percival opus, c. 1973:
http://wrightchat.savewright.org/viewto ... 9&start=30
Here is Bill's house and the Percival plan, side by side:
Readers should remember that, south of the equator, the sun arcs to the north. Virr had intended the Percival house to be oriented to the sun; the client rotated the plan to face an ocean view.
A walkway at the entrance of the Buck house leads to a detached garage. Note that, in both designs, the entry is approached from the same quadrant of the plan. (Had Wright been the designer, one wonders if he would have provided a separate kitchen ("back-door") entrance; the main entrance might have been through the passage adjacent to the bedroom---which would then have had to be screened or partitioned ?)