EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Farnsworth: white, floor elevated to eye level as seen from exterior (5’3”), no diagonals, no arcs or curves, floating slab acting as a transition from house to ground, entrance from the side.
Johnson: black, rests directly on ground, brick herringbone floor (More Wrightian than Miesian?), circular bath element, diagonal pathway leading to symmetrically placed entrance on long side of rectangle.
His late modern and postmodern work is highly derivative, and typically shallow when compared to architects who were in the vanguard.
His racist, antisemitic, Nazi courting is difficult to justify. He described himself as a whore. Maybe his own admission and apologies are enough, though it doesn’t seem he learned all that much from those mistakes?
Do-gooders in San Francisco are trying to take the names of Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt off the facades of public schools here, as punishment for their faults. I suppose the same thing is going on all around the country, these days. It's both ridiculous and insulting, not least to the memories of men rightly honored for the good they did. What are people afraid of---that slavery will resume or adultery run rampant in high places, and the remedy is to punish dead heroes in a ritual sacrifice ?
SDR - Agree with much of what you say. I don't give them credit as do-gooders. They (most) are either nihilist or Marxists.
Nihilist - Lincoln and FDR did not create their times. They were some of the better men (people) in them. They led to make things better and made great sacrifices. Lincoln died for the cause. FDR's mental and emotional burdens are unfathomable. Lincoln could have had a nice quiet upper middle class existence. FDR could have been living on a yacht. Both could have avoided the hassle.
Marxists (not AOC socialism, but *, we own you (a dictator just while we work out the details) while pretending "you/we" own the means of production) - This group's objective is destruction of society. Burn it down to rebuild it.
Both of these groups need to be told to bleep off.
Excellent critique of censorship and cancel culture from the left:
http://sfbaytimes.com/todays-cancel-cul ... ver-works/
After all, there are many names and figures that can be honored on public schools and as statues in public parks...
Jim DeLong told me the same was true of Neutra. His work went through various styles, each depending on his collaborator. But it must also be noted that Jim detested Neutra on a personal level, so his critique may be colored.
Through the democratic process, I should have input ("say so") over the names of my local schools and parks. For the folks in SF (I do not live there), as it relates to their local schools and parks, God bless and have fun.
Scrubbing FDR and Lincoln off public buildings is like removing the Crucifix from a Catholic Church. Some symbols and names are just that core to the institution. I don't trust the intent or motivation. I suspect evil.
If I'm interpreting this correctly, the symbol of the crucifix is central to the Catholic Church... clear enough... However the analogy to a public building therefore is that FDR and Lincoln specifically are symbols of democracy....? I'd agree that they are symbols of democracy, broadly speaking, but that many, many others would also be symbols of democracy. Which means that the ability to choose those symbols by the people is in fact the symbolic and actualized event of democracy.Scrubbing FDR and Lincoln off public buildings is like removing the Crucifix from a Catholic Church. Some symbols and names are just that core to the institution.
The somewhat legitimate question which the right raises, is where do we stop? Who decides where we stop?
For me, removing all statue of traitors is a no brainer. Virginia finally removed their Robert E. Lee just this week.
The ones in our society lately who seem intent on---who have actually said they aim to---burn down the institutions are reckless radicals like Steve Bannon and the white nationalists who listen to him. Look to Newt Gingrich et al for the seeds of the movement: if you think you're right, burn the other side and take no prisoners.
There are no Marxists; antifa is a made-up bogey-man intended to scare the unschooled and undecided into Trump's camp. Socialism is NOT communism; the words connote different things. Social Security and Medicare are socialist mechanisms that the vast majority of Americans approve of. Public services provided by government and apportioned to those who need them is a socialist construct; that is the socialism that Bernie Sanders et al promote. Again---what's good for the country, not just for corporations and the uber-rich. Congress this month is a good example of what's gone wrong; call that evil if you want.
Interestingly, you don't see the Left in this country inventing shadow groups of right-wingers to blame for their woes and worries; the Right is plenty good at providing living examples of bad behavior---start with Mitch McConnell or Stephen Miller.
Hilary has been roundly hooted down for invoking "a vast right-wing conspiracy" a million years ago now (though she had access to facts not generally available ?); "deplorable" is a good word for what's happened to the Republican party. Barack spoke the truth when he invoked people clinging to societal and NRA-fueled crutches in their fear and pain---but he wouldn't be the first leader to pay a price for telling it like it is. MLK, anyone . . .?
Your restatement is close enough (of my analogy).
SDR. Agree. But history did take one path (does take only one path, unless Elon Musk proves otherwise).