William BOSWELL house

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
juankbedoya
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:30 am

Post by juankbedoya »

Roderick Grant wrote:Boswell #1 is very much like Ina Morris Harper. It is an excellent design, much more striking than Boswell #2.
yes is more fearless, I like the way he applied geometry and emplacement but I like the Boswell #2 a lot of too.

juankbedoya
Posts: 161
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2019 10:30 am

Post by juankbedoya »

SDR wrote:It appears that the roof of the first proposal is seen in two iterations, in the illustrations above ?

S
Yes, it confuses me, in the perspective it seems that the roof goes up but in the elevation the roof goes down..!!

Roderick Grant
Posts: 10208
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Post by Roderick Grant »

More than the roof is different. Note that the balconies on the perspective become walled terraces on the elevation. If that is all there was to it, plus the roof, it might be a variation of #1, or perhaps as-built should #3?

Post Reply