Page 1 of 1
Article: ArchitectureÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s rekindled love affair with brick
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:23 pm
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 10:33 am
On a scale of 0 to 5, I give this story a 2 on the Wright Chat Wrelevance Wright-O-Meter Ã¢â€žÂ¢
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 11:32 am
SDR wrote:On a scale of 0 to 5, I give this story a 2 on the Wright Chat Wrelevance Wright-O-Meter Ã¢â€žÂ¢
Here's the deal, Stephen. If you are going to chronically 'rate' my efforts on here - you will instantly be putting an end to those efforts.
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 1:19 pm
Here's the deal David, you need to curate just a little.
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:26 pm
Here's the deal, egads. If you believe the things I post are anything ranging from an annoyance to a detriment to the Forum I would suggest one or more of the following:
- first: and foremost, try doing the task yourself.
- second: complain loudly on here - and then even louder to the powers that be at the Conservancy.
- third: suggest that I run each post past you and/or Stephen for clearance.
- fourth: ignore each-and-every one of my posts.
- fifth: take up knitting.
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:45 pm
David seems to enjoy posting whatever he finds that has the word "Wright" in it. Sometimes these items belong in "Sure, we can call . . .", other times they are uniquely relevant to what we discuss here -- items I'm sure most of us would have missed, in the vast media universe out there.
On the whole, it's a service, and one that no one else seems to have cared to provide. I suggest we leave him to it, and enjoy the benefits that accrue.
Thank you, David. I enjoyed my little jest; I'm sorry that you found it offensive, and I apologize.
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:24 pm
We need more 'Davids,' not fewer.
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 2:32 pm
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:04 pm
Thank you for the apology, Stephen. It is most certainly accepted and appreciated.
And, thank you both Roderick and Peter.