White house not "a dump" ?
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/0 ... ine-241279
On a more serious subject:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/07 ... MzMDM4NQS2
First two paragraphs:
On the morning after the election, November 9, 2016, the people who ran the U.S. Department of Energy turned up in their offices and waited. They
had cleared 30 desks and freed up 30 parking spaces. They didn’t know exactly how many people they’d host that day, but whoever won the election
would surely be sending a small army into the Department of Energy, and every other federal agency. The morning after he was elected president,
eight years earlier, Obama had sent between 30 and 40 people into the Department of Energy. The Department of Energy staff planned to deliver
the same talks from the same five-inch-thick three-ring binders, with the Department of Energy seal on them, to the Trump people as they would
have given to the Clinton people. “Nothing had to be changed,� said one former Department of Energy staffer. “They’d be done always with the
intention that, either party wins, nothing changes.�
By afternoon the silence was deafening. “Day 1, we’re ready to go,â€� says a former senior White House official. “Day 2 it was ‘Maybe they’ll call us?’ â€�
Last two paragraphs:
As I drove out of [the] Hanford [Nuclear Reservation] the Trump administration unveiled its budget for the Department of Energy. ARPA-E
[The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy] had since won the praise of business leaders from Bill Gates to Lee Scott, the former C.E.O. of
Walmart, to Fred Smith, the Republican founder of FedEx, who has said that “pound for pound, dollar for dollar, activity for activity, it’s hard to find a
more effective thing government has done than ARPA-E.� Trump’s budget eliminates ARPA-E altogether. It also eliminates the spectacularly successful
$70 billion loan program. It cuts funding to the national labs in a way that implies the laying off of 6,000 of their people. It eliminates all research on
climate change. It halves the funding for work to secure the electrical grid from attack or natural disaster. “All the risks are science-based,� said John
MacWilliams when he saw the budget. “You can’t gut the science. If you do, you are hurting the country. If you gut the core competency of the D.O.E.,
you gut the country.�
But you can. Indeed, if you are seeking to preserve a certain worldview, it actually helps to gut science. Trump’s budget, like the social forces behind it,
is powered by a perverse desire—to remain ignorant. Trump didn’t invent this desire. He is just its ultimate expression.