EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
Ty Cobb intentionally tried to cleat Jackie at every opportunity. Was Robinson ever going to make a fuss about that? Not a chance. Branch Rickey would have sent him back to the Negro Leagues in a heartbeat.
As a strange footnote Ty Cobb, a relative of the racist baseball all star is now an attorney for Donald Trump's White House.
The Obama race story will go around in circles for the rest of time, with no proof that it was what caused any of his Red Line in the Sand failures, or contributed to whatever successes he had. There is no adequate response to what will forever shadow his legacy, and I suspect he, of all people, will rue that sad fact. I for one never cared about his half-black/half-white status, and on the other side would gleefully have voted for J. C. Watts if he had decided to run in 1992 (when he first became eligible) or later. In fact, I would have jumped the line and voted for Shirley Chisholm in '72, if the DNC had had the kahunas to nominate her. I may have disagreed with some of her undemocratic Democracy, but her worthiness to be given a chance was unquestionable to me.
Ty Cobb? You use that example, by way of his (supposed) relationship to the lawyer, to attack Trump by association? Cobb was not only racist, he murdered two muggers with his bare hands. His career is proof that all one has ever needed to succeed in American sports is the ability to play the game. That doesn't even reflect well on Jackie Robinson's career. There's enough questionable stuff to deal with, Peter; you don't have to scramble for anything as tenuous as a distant cousin.
"It's hard to believe that Elizabeth Southerland is retiring because of a budget proposal and not because she's eligible for her government pension,â€� EPA spokesman Jahan Wilcox told Environment & Energy Publishing in an email.
I mean, after 30 years she must be a deadbeat looking for a handout, right?
Those Calls to Trump? White House Admits They Didnâ€™t Happen
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/us/p ... appen.html
It all is so reminiscent of John Lovitz's "Tommy Flanagan".
12:36 PM - Aug 15, 2011 " -DJT
From the article:
" On the campaign trail, Trump was adamant: He would rarely play golf â€” â€œIâ€™m not going to have time to go play golf,â€� he once said â€” and he certainly wasnâ€™t going to take a lot of vacation. (â€œThereâ€™s just so much to be done,â€� he told â€œ60 Minutes,â€� â€œso I donâ€™t think weâ€™ll be very big on vacations.â€�) "
17 day vacation for the overprivileged one begins today:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pol ... cdac14887f
But I do find this relevant, only because he was so adamant in relentlessly criticizing Barack Obama, for all of the wrong reasons:
" By our count, by the end of August, Trump will have spent all or part of 53 days in office at leisure, compared with 15 days for Obama through August 2009. Whatâ€™s more, Trump will have played at least 33 rounds of golf, nearly double Obamaâ€™s 17 rounds â€” and thatâ€™s even before Trump gets to his vacation spot, an actual golf course. "
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/0 ... ine-241279
On a more serious subject:
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/07 ... MzMDM4NQS2
First two paragraphs:
On the morning after the election, November 9, 2016, the people who ran the U.S. Department of Energy turned up in their offices and waited. They
had cleared 30 desks and freed up 30 parking spaces. They didnâ€™t know exactly how many people theyâ€™d host that day, but whoever won the election
would surely be sending a small army into the Department of Energy, and every other federal agency. The morning after he was elected president,
eight years earlier, Obama had sent between 30 and 40 people into the Department of Energy. The Department of Energy staff planned to deliver
the same talks from the same five-inch-thick three-ring binders, with the Department of Energy seal on them, to the Trump people as they would
have given to the Clinton people. â€œNothing had to be changed,â€� said one former Department of Energy staffer. â€œTheyâ€™d be done always with the
intention that, either party wins, nothing changes.â€�
By afternoon the silence was deafening. â€œDay 1, weâ€™re ready to go,â€� says a former senior White House official. â€œDay 2 it was â€˜Maybe theyâ€™ll call us?â€™ â€�
Last two paragraphs:
As I drove out of [the] Hanford [Nuclear Reservation] the Trump administration unveiled its budget for the Department of Energy. ARPA-E
[The Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy] had since won the praise of business leaders from Bill Gates to Lee Scott, the former C.E.O. of
Walmart, to Fred Smith, the Republican founder of FedEx, who has said that â€œpound for pound, dollar for dollar, activity for activity, itâ€™s hard to find a
more effective thing government has done than ARPA-E.â€� Trumpâ€™s budget eliminates ARPA-E altogether. It also eliminates the spectacularly successful
$70 billion loan program. It cuts funding to the national labs in a way that implies the laying off of 6,000 of their people. It eliminates all research on
climate change. It halves the funding for work to secure the electrical grid from attack or natural disaster. â€œAll the risks are science-based,â€� said John
MacWilliams when he saw the budget. â€œYou canâ€™t gut the science. If you do, you are hurting the country. If you gut the core competency of the D.O.E.,
you gut the country.â€�
But you can. Indeed, if you are seeking to preserve a certain worldview, it actually helps to gut science. Trumpâ€™s budget, like the social forces behind it,
is powered by a perverse desireâ€”to remain ignorant. Trump didnâ€™t invent this desire. He is just its ultimate expression.