Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

To control SPAM, you must now be a registered user to post to this Message Board.

EFFECTIVE 14 Nov. 2012 PRIVATE MESSAGING HAS BEEN RE-ENABLED. IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPICIOUS DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS AND PLEASE REPORT TO THE ADMINISTRATOR FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.

This is the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy's Message Board. Wright enthusiasts can post questions and comments, and other people visiting the site can respond.

You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, *-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time they see fit.
DavidC
Posts: 7993
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by DavidC »


Roderick Grant
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by Roderick Grant »

From the exterior views, this looks like an interesting design that doesn't need to piggy-back on FLW. Inside, the spaces are interesting, but the finishes look like vintage Pier 1.

SDR
Posts: 19711
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by SDR »

The stair hall has some interest; otherwise, no. What could be more stultifying than a window wall composed of separate punched openings, each surrounded by its own trim ?

S

DavidC
Posts: 7993
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by DavidC »


DavidC
Posts: 7993
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by DavidC »


Roderick Grant
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by Roderick Grant »

Is there a recording of the music that real estate ads use?
Wouldn't that be a boon for anyone trying to drive himself insane?

outside in
Posts: 1262
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:02 pm
Location: chicago

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by outside in »

I've been in the house on Asbury - well before all the "improvements". The owner at that time made the claim about Wright as well, but I believe that George Maher was responsible for the various additions and rehab in 1902.

DavidC
Posts: 7993
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by DavidC »


Roderick Grant
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:48 am

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by Roderick Grant »

Well worth watching. I envy people who can do woodwork of this quality. If I were to try, I would have fewer fingers.

SDR
Posts: 19711
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by SDR »

Not necessarily. I didn't see him doing anything dumb, other than getting his cut-off saw stuck in its kerf practically before starting. He's got some good moves, and a lot of nice Festool and other equipment. Those vacuum work-piece clamps are nifty. The Rubio Monocoat is sold primarily as a floor finish; some like its eco characteristics. Application is labor-intensive (that's an impressive buffer he's got) and the finish brings out that wild grain nicely. I consider the top lumber unfortunate; the "live edge" fad, supposedly paying homage to Nakashima and others, can be overused; sapwood will always be sapwood.

The form of the table is pleasant, and the maker is honest in his assessment of the stability issue of his design. I like the base . . .

The speeded-up filming is mostly effective, though the triple-speed segment covering the first steps to the steel parts leaves us uninformed. It always puzzles and saddens me to see a maker rushing through any steps, like the drilling of the steel. And this guy can't free-drill straight to save his life. Still, the right amount of time was spent to show each step in the process, I'd say.

S

DavidC
Posts: 7993
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:22 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by DavidC »

Prototyping in Cardboard - (47:24)


David

SDR
Posts: 19711
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by SDR »

Looking for more images of that drafting stool. The drafting table base makes perfect sense, its triangles adapted to the task at hand (as it were). The stool: not so much ? Was it someone's afterthought (or assignment), to make something related to the table base ? What is that T-shaped construct about ? The forward-shooting leg mimics that of the table---but what keeps it from breaking off ? How is that stressed right-angle connection made, and reinforced ?

https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Image/IM25671

By laminating his material, C Wagner is able to create a nice through-mortise and tenon joint---about the most that can be done with that connection. How was the more slender material of the Taliesin stool---with a much smaller area of penetration or overlap compared to length of leg---joined ?

S

Rood
Posts: 1176
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 12:19 pm
Location: Goodyear, AZ 85338

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by Rood »

SDR wrote:
Sat Oct 17, 2020 5:53 pm
Looking for more images of that drafting stool. The drafting table base makes perfect sense, its triangles adapted to the task at hand (as it were). The stool: not so much ? Was it someone's afterthought (or assignment), to make something related to the table base ? What is that T-shaped construct about ? The forward-shooting leg mimics that of the table---but what keeps it from breaking off ? How is that stressed right-angle connection made, and reinforced ?

https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Image/IM25671

By laminating his material, C Wagner is able to create a nice through-mortise and tenon joint---about the most that can be done with that connection. How was the more slender material of the Taliesin stool---with a much smaller area of penetration or overlap compared to length of leg---joined ? S
If I'm not mistaken, I have plans for the stool somewhere in my files, but where? I actually built one of those stools many years ago (57?), after John R. had me redraw the by-then well-faded drawings found in the files at Taliesin West.

About the same time John R also had Bill Mims completely redesign the draughting tables ... to house a horizontal drawing shelf resting a few inches below the actual drawing surface ... plus a cabinet at one side to house a large metal drawing equipment box ... Each apprentice then rebuilt their own draughting table, using Bill's prototype as a guide.

SDR
Posts: 19711
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by SDR »

Oh, thank the lord you're still around ! A whole study could be conducted, of the "work furnishings" at the Taliesins---I guess. Perhaps the study could extend backward, to Wright's earliest studio and every one that followed ?

So much to look for. When was the earliest version of the Hillside drafting table drawn, and made ? Was there something similar at Ocotillo ?

SDR
Posts: 19711
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Sure, we can call anything "Frank Lloyd Wright"

Post by SDR »

The structural question re the Hillside drafting stool is answered satisfactorily by this detail from a 1940 photo made by Pedro Guerrero and found on p 231 of the second Taschen volume.


Image


And, looking more closely at the Howe photo linked above, that vital, dark-colored triangular gusset appears to be present:

Image

Post Reply