Wright Chat

David,

The majority of it is still at TWest, though some projects were cherry-picked out and included in with what the Avery took. You'd have to reach out to the FLWF to see if they've fully catalogued it yet and how accessible it is.

I'm almost 100% certain this is a fake

Two words: caveat emptor

http://img4.imagetitan.com/img4/small/20/20_oad_v5n2_wrightroots_1.jpg If you're interested in learning more about Wright's early work with Adler & Sullivan, etc., Volume 5/Number 2 of the Journal of Organic Architecture + Design written by Tim Samuelson is a must-read: https://www.oadarchives.com/...

Hello, If anyone has the 4 volume set of The Architectural Drawings of R.M. Schindler: the Architectural Drawing Collection , University Art Museum, published by the defunct Garland Architectural Archives they would be willing to part with please let me know. I've been looking for these books for so...

Because they are likely forgeries.

Buyer beware!

Kathryn Smith describes this previously unknown project for the Price Family on the last spread in V6/N3 of the Journal OA+D:

https://www.oadarchives.com/product/jou ... -pre-order

From the August 1894 Inland Architect, cementing Wright's authorship of this residence:

Those interested in Goff, the Frank House, and other topics in that orbit should check out the Friends of Kebyar and their many journals:

https://friendsofkebyar.com

One of the past "Explore Wright" newsletters explained the details of busting this Wright myth, if anyone has a copy. Eric, Please explain what the "Explore Wright" newsletters are. When were they published and by whom. Are copies still available? Sorry�like the 1910 Universal Portland Cemen...

That leaves only one detail: Did Universal Portland Cement exist before its incorporation? Not that it makes any difference. My guess is that FLW transposed '10' as '01'. The Universal Portland Cement Co. was incorporated as a new concern in 1906 to take over the cement business of the Illinois Ste...

SDR--it's a little too much to post here so I sent you an email.

One of the past "Explore Wright" newsletters explained the details of busting this Wright myth, if anyone has a copy.

The reason there are no photos or drawings for the Buffalo pavilion in 1901 (Storrer 63) is because it never existed.

SDR,

David Jameson operated the bricks and mortar ArchiTech Gallery and consigned these drawings originally.

I would address your questions to him first:

http://www.architechgallery.com/

Reprints are definitely a possibility, but with such thin resources, the new issues get priority. More people signing up for subscriptions and end-of-year donations to the not-for-profit would definitely go a long way to help ensure the work OA+D does can continue and grow in the coming year: https:...